Sunday, April 26, 2026

Doom Report (Week 66: What Evil Lurks in the Hearts of Men? The Shadow Docket)


If you don’t know what the “shadow docket” is, you probably should.  See, sometimes our Supreme Court just issues a ruling: no trial, no arguments, and—most crucially—no explanation.  The most we get is the count of how many justices concurred and how many dissented, and sometimes the dissenters will write up a little “this is bullshit!” screed so that we observers know it’s not us who’s crazy for thinking this entire process is kinda skeezy.  Ostensibly, the purpose of the shadow docket is for emergencies: situations where a full hearing would take too long and the situation needs an immediate decision.  In practice, this particular court often uses it to agree with the Trump regime without having to explain itself.  Better yet, since the media tends to focus on the flashy trials with all the belabored arguments, shadow docket decisions can often fly under the radar.  Just a quick vote among the rightwing nutjob justices, give the mad king what he wants, and move swiftly on to an issue where they can say “no” to Trump (e.g. tariffs, birthright citizenship) and preserve their aura of “independence.”

So I know what it is, but I always thought the shadow docket was this thing that had always been around, and this court was just perverting it for their own sleazy agenda.  But, no: turns out that the shadow docket was, in fact, entirely invented by our very own current Chief Justice, John Roberts.  And, according to a new exposé on the origin of the shadow docket, it was, in fact, invented because Roberts didn’t care for something Obama wanted to do.  Quick! the government is about to favor real people over corporations in this one, very narrow case!  This is an EMERGENCY!

You can get full debriefs on the New York Times story from either Takes by Jamelle Bouie or Strict Scrutiny’s Leah Litman and guest Steve Vladeck (or preferably both), but definitely don’t sleep on this further example of how the rightwing nutjobs are twisting our institutions to their whims.


Other things you need to know this week:

  • Ben McKenzie is everywhere.  You may recall that I mentioned last week that the actor-turned-economist was on The Weekly Show; well, this week he shows up on The Daily Show for a shorter chat with Michael Kosta and also on Hasan Minhaj Doesn’t Know, where Hasan has a chat with him that is every bit as informative (and as long) as the Jon Stewart interview, and maybe even a bit more entertaining to boot.
  • The Some More News crew republished a highlight from an old episode that breaks down Stephen Miller’s weird origin story.  If you missed it the first time around, you should definitely check it out (and, even if you saw it way back when, it might be worth a refresher).  Dude is a very creepy, very weird, not-quite-human racist of the highest caliber.  Not that high-caliber racism is something to be proud of.  Although Stephen Miller likely would be.


As I write this, the attempted shooting of Trump at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner is too new to have much coverage of it in the channels I frequent.  Brian Tyler Cohen has a pretty decent take on it here, and he notes that the primary fallout seems to be Trump saying, “see? this is why I have to have a ballroom.”  Which ... no.  It’s so inordinately ridiculous that it is (once again, as Mehdi Hasan is fond of saying) a thing that if proposed in the writer’s room of a political comedy—much less a political drama—would be shouted down for being too outrageous to be believed.

Some seem to want to view Trump’s apathy towards the multiple people who want to kill him as a sign of how tough he is, how resilient in the face of opposing odds.  I don’t know, man: I kinda think that when your response to “this person wanted you dead, sir” is “great! now how can I turn this to my advantage?” ... that might be a sign you’ve got some deeper issues.  Like maybe you’re one of those psychopaths who believe that other people don’t actually exist, so obviously you can’t be killed.  Or maybe you’re one of those people who think they’re living in a simulation.  Or maybe it’s just that your pervasive narcissism won’t let you consider anything that doesn’t benefit you.  Whichever way it is, it doesn’t seem like it’s something we should be admiring.

I’m sure we’ll hear more about the attempted shooting next week.  In the meantime, if you want to feel relieved that our country has not yet succumbed to political violence at the highest level, that’s a laudable emotion to cultivate.  And, if you also want to allow yourself a brief moment to think that these half-assed morons trying to kill our president need to get a bit more competent ... well, I won’t tell anyone.









Sunday, April 19, 2026

Doom Report (Week 65: Actually, "Transformers Angel and the Generic Government Buildings" Would Be a Pretty Cool Band Name)


Sometimes I ask myself: is Trump the result of the failure of the two-party system?  Is it the case that the Republican party is only going along with Trump because they’re facing an existential crisis?  Because, remember: as recently as two years ago, many of the state Republican parties were on the verge of bankruptcy.  Nationwide, in the states which release such data, registered Democrats outnumber registered Republicans by significant margins, peaking in 2021 when there were 35% more Ds than Rs—not to mention that, sometime around 2015, the number of registered independents exceeded the number of Republicans for the first time, making the Repubs a third party in our two-party system.  Can the Republican party survive the inevitable Trump meltdown?  After January 6th, they lost tens of thousands of voters, and this year is set to be the one with the second highest number of Republican Congressional retirements since 1930 (the first? that would be 2018 ... during Trump’s first term).  So, sometimes I look at all that and wonder if the Republicans grabbed onto Trump the way a drowning man will grab onto any piece of wood that floats by ... even those which obviously cannot support their weight.

On the other hand, Brian Tyler Cohen has another theory: Trump just hates Obama.  And, while BTC (somewhat overly generously, in my opinion) frames this as one man hating another, younger, more handsome man, I can’t help but wonder: is it just the racism?  Because the fact that he’s racist isn’t really in question—there’s literally a Wikipedia article entitled “racial views of Donald Trump” (hint: they ain’t good).  From the 1973 DoJ case against Trump Management where the rental agents admitted to marking the paperwork of Black applicants so that they could be summarily denied, to his comments in January of this year that, as a result of the Civil Rights Movement, “White people were very badly treated”—if you know any racists, you’ll easily recognize the behavior.  And, trust me: I’m not here to excuse any racists.  But I have quite a few in my family, so I kind of understand how their brains work.  And, in my experience, they’ve all been told from a very young age that black people (and brown people, and Asian people, and Jewish people, and gay people, and women, and ...) are just not as good as them.  That they are naturally superior, and it’s not the black people’s fault, necessarily—it’s just God’s will, or evolution, or whatever—and being the superior race is just a burden they must all bear.  And when you have that kind of fundamental prejudice baked into your very bones, you will go to extreme lengths to tear down the accomplishments of black people (and brown people and Jewish people and women and ... it must be exhausting, really).  Because if a Black person actually does something better than you could, that shakes your very worldview, your very sense of identity.  This is a threat to your sense of self.  So when people wonder why Trump tore up the Iran nuclear deal that Obama made and never bothered to replace it, I don’t wonder: it’s simple.  That was a deal made by a Black man, so it must be terrible.  And he never replaced it with anything because he couldn’t.  Like any sleazy used car salesman, he’s not nearly as slick as he thinks he is, because he “succeeds” by taking credit for successes (even those of other people) and, when he fails, he just lies about it and calls that a success too.  And that’s why we’re currently fighting the stupidest, most unpopular war in our history, and actually losing, and getting screwed over on the price of oil while Trump says we’ve already won (again and again and again) and says we don’t even need the Strait of Hormuz anyway.  Because he can’t stand to be upstaged by someone with more melanin than him.

It’s kind of sad, when you think about it.  And also very, very fucked up.


Other things you need to know this week:

  • If you want prime coverage on Pete Hegseth quoting Pulp Fiction as the Bible, both Alex Wagner and Stephen Colbert give you some side-by-side comparisons.
  • After a couple of weeks of subpar “week in review” segments, Adam Kinzinger is back with another pretty good one.
  • On this week’s Weekly Show, Jon interviews actor-turned-economist Ben McKenzie about cryptocurrency.  Commissioner Gordon from Gotham seems an unlikely choice to talk about crypto, but he actually has a degree in economics, so it’s not as crazy as it sounds initially, and I actually found him to be pretty articulate on the topic.  He exposes the scams of crypto while still acknowledging the things it can actually be good at, so even though he’s pretty negative on the industry overall, I still found it a pretty balanced discussion.
  • On this week’s Some More News, Cody asks the question “So, Donald Trump Can’t Cancel Elections ... Right?”.  The answer, as you might expect, is “right, but ...”  Or, as Cody and the SMN writers put it so eloquently: “It seems like they’ve realized that they can just do things, and by the time the consequences catch up, it’ll be too late.  The tariffs, for example, have been ruled illegal long after Trump implemented them, but the damage is apparently impossible to reverse: all the DOGE cuts, the ICE detentions, all these blatantly illegal and unconstitutional actions that we’re still trying to untangle after the fact.  Meanwhile, people have died and will not un-die.  Not without a tome and some candles, at least.”  Worth thinking about.


While it’s not strictly hope, sometimes you just watch a thing and have to raise your fist and say, “preach on, brother!”  This week, that comes from Zeteo.  Now, if you know Zeteo, you know that there are four main correspondents.  Founder Mehdi Hasan is the fast talker with the biting wit.  John Harwood is the knowledgeable but unexciting one.  Swin Suebsaeng is the passionate one.  And Prem Thakker is the calm, friendly one.  So when Prem goes off, it’s worth listening to.  On Zeteo’s weekly Q&A this week, Mehdi and Prem discussed Trump’s “doctor” picture—a.k.a. the “Doctor Jesus” image—and it led to this exchange:

Prem: I mean, look, I’ll just say, very quickly:  I’m a spiritual and religious person myself, and I think of—even for those who are not, who are atheist, agnostic, many of them at least carry themselves in such a way that, you know, a lot of their standards is that, no matter what higher power is out there, I believe that if I get to the pearly white gates and they see someone that led a life of good faith, of someone who is earnest and sincere, that that would be enough.  This guy, who purports to be some kind of Christian: the guy’s a tax cheat.  He started his presidential campaign with a tape that showed him saying he wants to grab women by their genitalia.  He’s insulted every community.  He looks at working people—your neighbors—with the most disdain and disgust possible.  He thinks we’re all hogs.  The thing is, is that we are run by a class of pedophilic, rapist, racist, parasitic, bloodthirsty people.  And atop that class is this guy whose legacy will be killing children and covering up files related to the most infamous pedophile on the planet!  And he, he—
Mehdi: Prem, I’ve never seen you this worked up.  I didn’t know Donald Trump made you this—I didn’t know this image would make you so worked up.
Prem: He’s just not going to make it through the pearly white gates.  That’s all I’m saying.  He’s not going to make it through.

And, you know, being one of those atheist/agnostic people myself, and hearing how Evangelicals and Catholics are too often Trump supporters, I sometimes forget how deeply offensive some of this is to genuine people of faith.  When I see Trump posting a picture of himself as Jesus, with 1940s Nurse and Transformers Angel and the Statue of Liberty in New York standing in front of Generic Washington DC Government Building, I’m just laughing at the complete ridiculosity of it all.  But there are people out there who see it and feel like their entire theology is being mocked, and Trump’s furious backpedaling and claiming that it’s supposed to be him as a doctor and only the fake news could think otherwise is not really soothing their outrage.  Nor should it.  They should be incensed, and I’m glad to hear that reaction from even some of Trump’s most ardent supporters.  Maybe he finally crossed a line.  Seems so unlikely, after a decade of never wavering from the full embodiment of the garbage person he’s always been, but, hey: there has to be some limit to what people will put up with, and maybe this is it.  And, while, honestly, I would have been happier if the limit was seeing all the brown people getting killed by ICE or the trans women being brutalized after their illegal transfers into men’s prisons, I’ll take what I can get.

So, I dunno—maybe that’s some hope after all.  In a very small way.









Sunday, April 12, 2026

Doom Report (Week 64: Most Vagy Soha! Now or Never!)


Remember in week 58 when I talked about the Gorton and Denton by-election in the UK?  Well, Garys Economics is back from hiatus, with a deeper dive into the impact of this Green Party win.  And he covers why this one little election is both meaningless and explosive, because it’s a thing that, in his words, should have been impossible.  Now, I don’t agree with him entirely—for instance, note that he keeps on insisting that the British system has been designed for 250 years to force elections into the shape of two-horse races, but he never mentions that one of the parties he’s considering to be one of those horses didn’t even exist 10 years ago, which pretty much puts the nail in the coffin of that theory.  Plus, I find his desperate pleas to Labour (who are, in my consistent analogy of US to UK politics, the equivalent of the corporate Democrats) somewhat amusing.  Remember, Gary isn’t really a member of Labour in the same way that BTC or the Pod Save America guys actually are Democrats: he just wants his ideas to win, and he thinks Labour is his best chance of achieving that goal.  But his description of how the Greens were able to capitalize on the failures of Labour are pretty inspirational: if Reform can replace the Conservatives in the same way that MAGA took over the Republican party, then maybe the Greens threatening Labour is a sign that progressive Democrats have a chance of taking over the Democratic party.

Worth considering, in any event.


Other things you need to know this week:

  • If you need to understand why the Supreme Court isn’t being “reasonable” when it seems poised to hand Trump a defeat on birthright citizenship, the ladies of Strict Scrutiny, as always have you covered.  Plus, a lot of glee over Bondi’s firing, which is always fun to listen to.
  • Even More News had a pretty great Friday episode, with Dr. Kaveh Hoda (who happens to be of Persian descent) talking about our demented President’s actions in Iran.
  • Wondering how California’s proposed “billionaire tax” would work?  Let Robert Reich explain it to you.


Often I write these reports on Saturday for posting the next day, so, if good news shows up on Sunday, you’ll never hear it from me: it arrived too late.  But, occasionally, I don’t get around to the writing till Sunday, and, even more occasionally, that happens to align with the arrival of some hope.  Today is one of those rare Sundays.

Today, Viktor Orbán lost re-election in Hungary.  And not by a little: in Hungary’s 199-seat Parliament, Orbán’s party is likely to retain only 55.  This was a blowout.  And maybe that portends something for our own situation.  Because there’s a very good reason that I’ve mentioned Orbán multiple times in these Reports (weeks 5 and 31 in particular): Hungary has been the template for how to do a rightwing takeover of a liberal democracy.  We share some of the same political consultants with them, even.  Hell, JD Vance even visited Budapest to urge Hungarian voters to support the now-defeated would-be dictator.  Could it be that Vance and the rest of the Trump regime are scared of what this defeat might mean for them?  Brian Tyler Cohen and Ben Rhodes (cohost of Pod Save the World) seem to think so.  They posit that Hungary will, perhaps, follow the example of Brazil and start holding some people accountable, and then that will, perhaps, be an inspiration to the Democrats, should they ever get their shit together sufficiently to win another Presidential election.  This may all be wishcasting, of course—and I continue to believe that the Democrats are a poor, poor substitute for the political party that we actually deserve—but it’s a pretty fantasy, and at least the first step in that long road has been taken.  That’s worth celebrating, I’d say.









Sunday, April 5, 2026

Doom Report (Week 63: Same Ol' Story)


Happy Easter, for those that celebrate; happy Passover, for those that celebrate; and happy day-for-hiding-eggs-for-your-children-to-find, if your family, like ours, is primarily celebrating that.  And possibly day-for-overindulging-in-chocolate.  Day-for-being-inundated-by-small-egg-themed-toys, mayhap?  One or more of those, for sure.

On The Weekly Show this week, Jon interviews Heather Cox Richardson, who is always a good time: she’s articulate, extremely knowledgeable, and is quick with a historical perspective.  Early in the interview, they compare our “ship of state” to both the Titanic and the Pequod (from Moby-Dick).  For me, I feel like it’s a combination of both.  Trump is a bit like Captain Ahab spotting the iceberg and shouting “there’s the white whale: ramming speed!”

At one point, Jon points out that the founding fathers could not have foreseen “that political parties might abdicate all responsibility of power just to hold on to power.”  And, to me, that just exposes the absurdity of it all.  It reminded me of this extended quote from Mark Twain:

There are people who strictly deprive themselves of each and every eatable, drinkable, and smokable which has in any way acquired a shady reputation.  They pay this price for health.  And health is all they get for it.  How strange it is.  It is like paying out your whole fortune for a cow that has gone dry.

Likewise, if you give up all your power in order to maintain your grip on power ... what do you actually have?


Other things you need to know this week:

  • Or, if you prefer longer videos less often, Strict Scrutiny is generally an hour a week, thought they sometimes have shorter videos when there’s breaking Supreme Court fuckery.  As there was this week: Leah Litman and guest Shannon Minter, legal director at the National Center for LGBTQ Rights, cover the Court’s bonkers decision on conversion therapy.


I suppose the major news this week was Pam Bondi getting fired.  My favorite coverage of this was, once again, from the Even More News crew, though Alex Wagner also had a good show on it.  But I think the best take came from Cody and Katy and Jonathan (and their guest, Some More News head writer David Bell), who noted that Bondi was only the second high-profile firing this time around, after Kristi Noem, and that Trump is already making noises that he might need to replace press secretary Karoline Leavitt, and there are now rumors that he’s questioning Tulsi Gabbard.  And what do all these people have in common?  Jonathan comments: “Kelly Loeffler at the Small Business Administration has to hope that Trump does not remember who she is” (to which Cody responds “I promise you that he does not”).  But Katy really captures the essence of the issue thusly:

Katy:  And we’re going to be talking about this more in an episode in the future.  About the dynamic of MAGA women.
Cody: Is it good?
Katy: No!  You get these ladies out here and trot them out to carry water for this administration while they’re working against their own best interests and they are the first to get thrown under the bus.  It is, I mean ...
Cody: Predictable?
David: A pattern?
Katy: It’s predictable, it’s a pattern, it’s pathetic—I don’t have sympathy or empathy, but if they were any other type of people, I’d be like: you’re victims of this machine!  But you are perpetrating this machine.

And I feel like Katy was channeling my own feelings on Noem from back in week 57.  You can never have sympathy for these people, because you can never excuse them for the horrific things they’ve done.  But you could almost see the shape of who they might have been, if they had not taken a wrong turn somewhere along the line.  Now, personally, I’m even less of a fan of Bondi than I am of Noem, even though rationally that makes no sense.  Noem is personally responsible for ruining hundreds if not thousands of lives, including several outright murders.  Bondi, meanwhile, has been coldly inhuman to the Epstein survivors, and she has tried to make lives miserable for people like James Comey and Letitia James and Jerome Powell, but that latter group at least is composed almost entirely of public figures, and they had to accept a certain amount of mistreatment when they agreed to do their jobs.  And Bondi is probably not directly responsible for any murders—certainly not at the scale that Noem can lay claim to.  And yet ... somehow I feel that the Bondi biopic will not be nearly as interesting as the Noem one.  Not sure what it is about her that rubs me the wrong way, but something surely does.  I think perhaps there’s a fanatic’s light behind her eyes that I don’t see in Noem’s.  I think Noem’s guilt mostly stems from her ability to close her eyes to the suffering she’s causing, but I feel like Bondi is staring directly into it ... and smiling.  All of this is just projection on my part, I’m sure: I don’t know these people.  But, vindictively, I feel much better about Bondi’s firing than Noem’s.

And, should the rumors turn out to be true and Lee Zeldin is Trump’s pick to replace Bondi, then we will continue our pattern of not only firing all the women, but inevitably replacing them with men.  And that is the real tell, I think.  It says to me that Trump never wanted these women around in the first place—and, in my mind, the word “women” is spoken with a tone of utter disdain—and he’s only too happy to finally get rid of them all and replace them all with men.  White men.  Of a certain class.  Who look like they’re from “central casting.”

But I’m not sure anyone should be surprised at this point.  We know how Trump feels about women: he keeps on telling usover, and over, and over again.  Was there ever any doubt that the MAGA women, from Marjorie Taylor Greene to Pam Bondi and beyond, would be first on the chopping block?  Well, some of them seem surprised, I suppose.  But for the rest of us, it’s misogyny as usual.